<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Can&#8217;t Force Them To Come To You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/you-cant-force-them-to-come-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/you-cant-force-them-to-come-to-you/</link>
	<description>news &#38; perspectives on fan communication and online social life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:23:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Baym</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/you-cant-force-them-to-come-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Baym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/you-cant-force-them-to-come-to-you/#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a fair question and I have 2 responses.

First, on intellectual property. My point is that not all intellectual property violations are harmful. In fandom, they are often beneficial to the artist. When they are (for example: unauthorized sales of copyrighted material), there&#039;s every right to go after the violators. When they are not (for example: sharing lyrics or tabs on fan sites, posting pictures of the artist, sharing unreleased bootlegs), the fans are best left alone.

Second, on defamation. If defamation is occurring in any venue, the artist has recourse by suing for defamation. It&#039;s important not to entangle the issues of agendas to damage a person&#039;s reputation and agendas to profit from others&#039; intellectual property. 

I&#039;d suggest that a &quot;fan group&quot; that has an agenda of defaming is not a fan group, though even anti-fan groups are often best left alone as attacking only brings publicity.

Distribution of materials is not intrinsically harmful to those who hold the copyright and I believe legal recourse should be saved for those occasions on which it clearly is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a fair question and I have 2 responses.</p>
<p>First, on intellectual property. My point is that not all intellectual property violations are harmful. In fandom, they are often beneficial to the artist. When they are (for example: unauthorized sales of copyrighted material), there&#8217;s every right to go after the violators. When they are not (for example: sharing lyrics or tabs on fan sites, posting pictures of the artist, sharing unreleased bootlegs), the fans are best left alone.</p>
<p>Second, on defamation. If defamation is occurring in any venue, the artist has recourse by suing for defamation. It&#8217;s important not to entangle the issues of agendas to damage a person&#8217;s reputation and agendas to profit from others&#8217; intellectual property. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d suggest that a &#8220;fan group&#8221; that has an agenda of defaming is not a fan group, though even anti-fan groups are often best left alone as attacking only brings publicity.</p>
<p>Distribution of materials is not intrinsically harmful to those who hold the copyright and I believe legal recourse should be saved for those occasions on which it clearly is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truefan</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/you-cant-force-them-to-come-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>truefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/you-cant-force-them-to-come-to-you/#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>What happens if a &quot;non-official&quot; fan site has an &quot;agenda&quot;, or they put stuff at their site or distributes stuff that violates intellectual property laws or defame the star they claim to love and support? I don&#039;t blame the celebs for wanting to perserve their rights of personality. Why should some fan be allowed to stage manage the star and try to control them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens if a &#8220;non-official&#8221; fan site has an &#8220;agenda&#8221;, or they put stuff at their site or distributes stuff that violates intellectual property laws or defame the star they claim to love and support? I don&#8217;t blame the celebs for wanting to perserve their rights of personality. Why should some fan be allowed to stage manage the star and try to control them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
