<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs vs Twitter? It&#8217;s the Interactivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/blogs-vs-twitter-its-the-interactivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/blogs-vs-twitter-its-the-interactivity/</link>
	<description>news &#38; perspectives on fan communication and online social life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joitske</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/blogs-vs-twitter-its-the-interactivity/comment-page-1/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>Joitske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinefandom.com/?p=594#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>I fully agree with the complementarity. It may even help to get blogging beyond the hype. (like phoning is not a hype, you just use it..). The capacity to reciprocate is much higher in twitter. when someone wants to follow me, I follow them back. But in my blog I don&#039;t know who is reading and why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree with the complementarity. It may even help to get blogging beyond the hype. (like phoning is not a hype, you just use it..). The capacity to reciprocate is much higher in twitter. when someone wants to follow me, I follow them back. But in my blog I don&#8217;t know who is reading and why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles H. Green</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/blogs-vs-twitter-its-the-interactivity/comment-page-1/#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles H. Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinefandom.com/?p=594#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>I find them complementary.

I use twitter as an intelligent RSS headline feed, assuming interesting writers will write interesting intros to their blogs.  It tells me which blogs to read.

I try to tweet the same way, giving people fast-search entree to what I believe will be of interest to those who have chosen to follow the &quot;brand&quot; I&#039;m creating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find them complementary.</p>
<p>I use twitter as an intelligent RSS headline feed, assuming interesting writers will write interesting intros to their blogs.  It tells me which blogs to read.</p>
<p>I try to tweet the same way, giving people fast-search entree to what I believe will be of interest to those who have chosen to follow the &#8220;brand&#8221; I&#8217;m creating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochelle</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/blogs-vs-twitter-its-the-interactivity/comment-page-1/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinefandom.com/?p=594#comment-1390</guid>
		<description>BANG ON! I&#039;m so tired of the constant complaints about twitter. Oi!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BANG ON! I&#8217;m so tired of the constant complaints about twitter. Oi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/blogs-vs-twitter-its-the-interactivity/comment-page-1/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinefandom.com/?p=594#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>I also agree that twitter doesn&#039;t replace blogs and instead serves to increase their exposure.  As you said, following someone&#039;s twitter stream day to day helps you to get to know them and if they write a blog, I&#039;m much more likely to read their posts because I &quot;know&quot; them through twitter.  There are a number of blogs that I read now, or at least individual posts, that I never would have found independently (such as this one).  I think the two certainly complement each other, and I look forward to seeing how that continues!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree that twitter doesn&#8217;t replace blogs and instead serves to increase their exposure.  As you said, following someone&#8217;s twitter stream day to day helps you to get to know them and if they write a blog, I&#8217;m much more likely to read their posts because I &#8220;know&#8221; them through twitter.  There are a number of blogs that I read now, or at least individual posts, that I never would have found independently (such as this one).  I think the two certainly complement each other, and I look forward to seeing how that continues!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Baym</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/blogs-vs-twitter-its-the-interactivity/comment-page-1/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Baym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinefandom.com/?p=594#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>Uh oh -- do I walk down the hall to talk to you face to face Dave or respond here? I did see Pitts&#039;s column, which I found unusually shallow for him and which demonstrated a totally predictable stereotypical outsider take on Twitter. Last week there were so many editorials, articles and even comics (Doonesbury!) took on Twitter and almost all with the same not even close to insightful analysis that it&#039;s banal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh oh &#8212; do I walk down the hall to talk to you face to face Dave or respond here? I did see Pitts&#8217;s column, which I found unusually shallow for him and which demonstrated a totally predictable stereotypical outsider take on Twitter. Last week there were so many editorials, articles and even comics (Doonesbury!) took on Twitter and almost all with the same not even close to insightful analysis that it&#8217;s banal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/blogs-vs-twitter-its-the-interactivity/comment-page-1/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinefandom.com/?p=594#comment-1384</guid>
		<description>In no way shape or form is Twitter even trying to replace the blog. If anything Twitter should be used as a writer&#039;s marketing function to better expose their site or column. Blogging is still a forum utilized to voice an opinion on a subject, therefore, will not literally die off as projected. Social networks must encourage the blog as a type of personal outlet of artist freedom found on the web. Take eZanga&#039;s www.HopOnThis.com for example. Not only are they encouraging member content, but they are rewarding their members for it. Their user generated content allots a specific number of points that can be traded in for prizes, cash, and gift cards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In no way shape or form is Twitter even trying to replace the blog. If anything Twitter should be used as a writer&#8217;s marketing function to better expose their site or column. Blogging is still a forum utilized to voice an opinion on a subject, therefore, will not literally die off as projected. Social networks must encourage the blog as a type of personal outlet of artist freedom found on the web. Take eZanga&#8217;s <a href="http://www.HopOnThis.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.HopOnThis.com</a> for example. Not only are they encouraging member content, but they are rewarding their members for it. Their user generated content allots a specific number of points that can be traded in for prizes, cash, and gift cards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davetell</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinefandom.com/archives/blogs-vs-twitter-its-the-interactivity/comment-page-1/#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>davetell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinefandom.com/?p=594#comment-1382</guid>
		<description>Nancy--you saw Pitts op-ed in the LJW last week on the Twitter and confessional culture? An odd confluence of our two research agendas. 

PS: I am still unclear on what, precisely, twitter is. 

PS2: the death of blogs? I hadn&#039;t heard. But as you have no doubt heard, author&#039;s are dead too, and that hasn&#039;t had much of an impact. So I&#039;m not too worried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy&#8211;you saw Pitts op-ed in the LJW last week on the Twitter and confessional culture? An odd confluence of our two research agendas. </p>
<p>PS: I am still unclear on what, precisely, twitter is. </p>
<p>PS2: the death of blogs? I hadn&#8217;t heard. But as you have no doubt heard, author&#8217;s are dead too, and that hasn&#8217;t had much of an impact. So I&#8217;m not too worried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

